Different books have slightly varying definitions. The "!?" is one of the more controversial symbols. Alternatively, this may denote a move that is objectively bad but sets up an attractive trap. A sacrifice leading to a dangerous attack that the opponent should be able to defend against if they play well may receive a "?!". The "?!" may also indicate that the annotator believes the move is weak/deserving of criticism but not bad enough to warrant a "?". This symbol is similar to the "!?" (below) but usually indicates that the annotator believes the move to be dubious or questionable but to possibly have merits. A move that overlooks a forthcoming brilliant combination from the opponent would rarely receive more than one question mark, for example. The nature of a mistake may be more strategic than tactical in some cases, the move receiving a question mark may be one for which it is difficult to find a refutation. Mistakes often lead to loss of tempo, material, or otherwise a worsening of the player's position. Though more common among less experienced players, blunders occur at all levels of play.Ī single question mark "?" indicates that the annotator thinks that the move is a mistake and that it should not have been played. Occasionally, the sign is used for a move that transforms a won position into a draw. A "?"-worthy move usually results in an immediately lost position. ![]() Typical moves that receive double question marks are those that overlook a tactic that wins substantial material or overlook a checkmate. The double question mark "?" indicates a blunder, a very bad move that severely worsens the player's position.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |